2: Theories of Judicial Behaviour

Court rulings have an impact on individuals, economies and political systems. In principle, judgments follow from legal rules. But how do judges make decisions in practice? This week we review the most influential theories of judicial behaviour, the conditions under which they apply and the evidence produced in their support.

Mandatory readings

Harris, Allison P., and Maya Sen. “Bias and judging.” Annual Review of Political Science 22, no. 1 (2019): 241-259.

Optional readings

Dyevre, Arthur. “Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics: towards a general theory of judicial behaviour.” European Political Science Review 2, no. 2 (2010): 297-327.

Choi, Donghyun Danny, J. Andrew Harris, and Fiona Shen-Bayh. “Ethnic bias in judicial decision making: Evidence from criminal appeals in Kenya.” American Political Science Review 116, no. 3 (2022): 1067-1080.

Glynn, Adam N., and Maya Sen. “Identifying judicial empathy: Does having daughters cause judges to rule for women’s issues?.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 1 (2015): 37-54.

Voeten, Erik. “Gender and judging: evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” Journal of European Public Policy 28, no. 9 (2021): 1453-1473.

Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. “Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging.” American journal of political science 54, no. 2 (2010): 389-411.

Edelman, Lauren B., Linda H. Krieger, Scott R. Eliason, Catherine R. Albiston, and Virginia Mellema. “When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures.” American journal of sociology 117, no. 3 (2011): 888-954.