Bibliography

To enable easier searching, below is a list of all the literature referenced on the lecture slides.

Abebe, Daniel, and Tom Ginsburg. 2019. “The Dejudicialization of International Politics?” International Studies Quarterly 63 (3): 521–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz032.

Alter, Karen J, and Jeannette Vargas. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 452–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033004002.

Arzheimer, Kai. 2024. “Identification with an Anti-System Party Undermines Diffuse Political Support: The Case of Alternative for Germany and Trust in the Federal Constitutional Court.” Party Politics, March 6, 13540688241237493. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241237493.

Ash, Elliott, Sam Asher, Aditi Bhowmick, et al. 2025. “In-Group Bias in the Indian Judiciary: Evidence from 5 Million Criminal Cases.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, March 5, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01569.

Ash, Elliott, Daniel L Chen, and Suresh Naidu. n.d. Ideas Have Consequences The Impact of Law and Economics on American Justice.

Ash, Elliott, and W. Bentley MacLeod. 2015. “Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Law and Economics 58 (4): 863–913. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684293.

Ash, Elliott, and Michael Poyker. 2024. “Conservative News Media and Criminal Justice: Evidence from Exposure to the Fox News Channel.” The Economic Journal 134 (660): 1331–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead108.

Badas, Alex, Bailey K. Sanders, and Katelyn E. Stauffer. 2024. “The Role of Judge Gender and Ideology in Hiring Female Law Clerks.” Journal of Law and Courts, November 20, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.8.

Bafumi, Joseph, Andrew Gelman, David K. Park, and Noah Kaplan. 2005. “Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation.” Political Analysis 13 (2): 171–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi010.

Bailey, Michael A., Brian Kamoie, and Forrest Maltzman. 2005. “Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 72–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647714.

Bartels, Brandon L., Jeremy Horowitz, and Eric Kramon. 2023. “Can Democratic Principles Protect High Courts from Partisan Backlash? Public Reactions to the Kenyan Supreme Court’s Role in the 2017 Election Crisis.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (3): 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12666.

Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher D. Johnston. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 184–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00616.x.

Bartels, Brandon L., and Eric Kramon. 2020. “Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who Is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa.” American Political Science Review 114 (1): 144–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000704.

Beim, Deborah, Tom S. Clark, and Benjamin E. Lauderdale. 2021. “Republican-Majority Appellate Panels Increase Execution Rates for Capital Defendants.” The Journal of Politics 83 (3): 1163–67. https://doi.org/10.1086/710969.

Beim, Deborah, Alexander V. Hirsch, and Jonathan P. Kastellec. 2014. “Whistleblowing and Compliance in the Judicial Hierarchy.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 904918. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12108/full.

Besley, Timothy, and Abigail Payne. 2013. “Implementation of Anti-Discrimination Policy: Does Judicial Selection Matter?” American Law and Economics Review 15 (1): 212–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/aht003.

Black, Ryan C., and Ryan J. Owens. 2011. “Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the u.s. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 765–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23056345.

Bracic, Ana, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel, Tyler Johnson, and Kathleen Tipler. 2023. ““Because He Is Gay”: How Race, Gender, and Sexuality Shape Perceptions of Judicial Fairness.” The Journal of Politics, ahead of print, October 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/723996.

Braman, Eileen, and Thomas E. Nelson. 2007. “Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 940–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00290.x.

Broscheid, Andreas. 2011. “Comparing Circuits: Are Some U.S. Courts of Appeals More Liberal or Conservative Than Others?” Law & Society Review 45 (1): 171–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00431.x.

Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 635–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111585.

Cameron, Charles M., and Jee-Kwang Park. 2009. “How Will They Vote? Predicting the Future Behavior of Supreme Court Nominees, 1937-2006.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (3): 485–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01151.x.

Cameron, Charles M., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Donald Songer. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94 (1): 101116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586383.

Carrubba, Clifford J., and Tom S. Clark. 2012. “Rule Creation in a Political Hierarchy.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 622–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541200024X.

Carrubba, Clifford J., and Christopher Zorn. 2010. “Executive Discretion, Judicial Decision Making, and Separation of Powers in the United States.” The Journal of Politics 72 (3): 812–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000186.

Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00485.x.

Chandler, Adam D. 2011. “The Solicitor General of the United States: Tenth Justice or Zealous Advocate?” The Yale Law Journal 121 (3): 725–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23079405.

Cheruvu, Sivaram, Jay N. Krehbiel, and Samantha Mussell. 2025. “Partisanship, Pragmatism, or Idealism? Evaluating Public Support for Backlashes Against International Courts in Backsliding Democracies.” Journal of European Public Policy, February 1. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501763.2024.2351921.

Clark, Tom S., Benjamin G. Engst, and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2018. “Estimating the Effect of Leisure on Judicial Performance.” The Journal of Legal Studies 47 (2): 349–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/699150.

Coglianese, Cary. 1996. “Litigating Within Relationships: Disputes and Disturbance in the Regulatory Process.” Law & Society Review 30 (4): 735–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054116.

Cross, Frank. 2005. “Appellate Court Adherence to Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2 (2): 369–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00054.x.

De Fazio, Gianluca. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715212439311.

Deschler, John, and Maya Sen. 2024. “The Role of Judge Ideology in Strategic Retirements in U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law & Empirical Analysis 1 (1): 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/2755323X241246849.

Dietrich, Bryce J., Ryan D. Enos, and Maya Sen. 2019. “Emotional Arousal Predicts Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Analysis 27 (2): 237–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.47.

Driscoll, Amanda, and Michael J. Nelson. 2015. “Judicial Selection and the Democratization of Justice: Lessons from the Bolivian Judicial Elections.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (1): 115–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/679017.

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Mark A. Pollack. 2017. “The Judicial Trilemma.” American Journal of International Law 111 (2): 225–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.23.

Dyevre, Arthur. 2010. “Unifying the Field of Comparative Judicial Politics: Towards a General Theory of Judicial Behaviour.” European Political Science Review 2 (2): 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773910000044.

Dyevre, Arthur. 2025. “Decision Making on the World Court: Are International Judges Geopolitically Biased?” Journal of Conflict Resolution.

Engel, Christoph, and Keren Weinshall. 2020. “Manna from Heaven for Judges: Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi-Random Reduction in Caseload.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17 (4): 722–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12265.

Engel, Christoph, and Lilia Zhurakhovska. 2017. “You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office.” The Journal of Legal Studies 46 (1): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/691630.

Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press.

Epp, Charles R. 2011. “The Support Structure as a Necessary Condition for Sustained Judicial Attention to Rights: A Response.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 406–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000089.

Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law The Law of Politics.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (3): 41–68. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lcp65&i=627.

Finkel, Jodi. 2005. “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s.” Latin American Politics and Society 47 (1): 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00302.x.

Fjelstul, Joshua C. 2023. “How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law.” Journal of Law and Courts 11 (1): 141–62. https://doi.org/10.1086/717422.

Foster, Chase. 2024. “Legalism Without Adversarialism?: Bureaucratic Legalism and the Politics of Regulatory Implementation in the European Union.” Regulation & Governance 18 (1): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12524.

Fox, Justin, and Matthew C. Stephenson. 2011. “Judicial Review as a Response to Political Posturing.” American Political Science Review 105 (02): 397414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000116.

Gabel, Matthew, Clifford J. Carrubba, Gretchen Helmke, et al. 2024. “CompLaw: A Coding Protocol and Database for the Comparative Study of Judicial Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 12 (2): 466–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.4.

Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023.

Gandur, Martín, Taylor Kinsley Chewning, and Amanda Driscoll. 2025. “Awareness of Executive Interference and the Demand for Judicial Independence: Evidence from Four Constitutional Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts, January 10, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.20.

Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. 2009. “Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence.” American Journal of Comparative Law 57: 103. http://0-heinonline.org.biblio.eui.eu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/amcomp57&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=22&men_tab=srchresults.

Gibson, James L. 1983. “From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior.” Political Behavior 5 (1): 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985.

Gibson, James L. 2024. “Losing Legitimacy: The Challenges of the Dobbs Ruling to Conventional Legitimacy Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 68 (3): 1041–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12834.

Gibson, James L., Milton Lodge, and Benjamin Woodson. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review 48 (4): 837–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12104.

Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles Do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14 (3): 592–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12157.

Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2022. “Judging Inequality: State Supreme Courts and the Inequality Crisis.” Political Science Quarterly 137 (2): 263–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13318.

Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875-1891.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 511–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000291.

Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge University Press.

Glynn, Adam N., and Maya Sen. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12118.

Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, and Elias Dinas. 2019. “Compensation and Compliance: Sources of Public Acceptance of the U.K. Supreme Court’s Brexit Decision.” Law & Society Review 53 (3): 889–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12421.

Grossman, Guy, Oren Gazal-Ayal, Samuel D. Pimentel, and Jeremy M. Weinstein. 2016. “Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12187.

Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. 2000. “Inside the Judicial Mind.” Cornell Law Review 86 (4): 777–830. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clqv86&i=785.

Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. 2001. “Inside the Judicial Mind.” Cornell Law Review 86: 777–830.

Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J Rachlinski, and Andrew J Wistrich. 2002. “Judging by Heuristic-Cognitive Illusions in Judicial Decision Making.” Judicature 86: 44.

Hall, Matthew E. K., and Joseph Daniel Ura. 2015. “Judicial Majoritarianism.” The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 818–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/681437.

Hall, Melinda Gann. 2014. “Representation in State Supreme Courts: Evidence from the Terminal Term.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 335–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913504500.

Hansford, Thomas G., Elisha Carol Savchak, and Donald R. Songer. 2010. “Politics, Careerism, and the Voluntary Departures of U.S. District Court Judges.” American Politics Research 38 (6): 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X10370735.

Harvey, Cole J. 2022. “Can Courts in Nondemocracies Deter Election Fraud? De Jure Judicial Independence, Political Competition, and Election Integrity.” American Political Science Review 116 (4): 1325–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000090.

Havelková, Barbara, David Kosař, and Marína Urbániková. 2022. “The Family Friendliness That Wasn’t: Access, but Not Progress, for Women in the Czech Judiciary.” Law & Social Inquiry 47 (4): 1106–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2021.62.

Hayo, Bernd, and Stefan Voigt. 2007. “Explaining de Facto Judicial Independence.” International Review of Law and Economics 27 (3): 269–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2007.07.004.

Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2005. “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo Review Essay.” California Law Review 93 (3): 899–956. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/calr93&i=911.

Helfer, Laurence R., and Erik Voeten. 2014. “International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe.” International Organization 68 (1): 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000398.

Helfer, Laurence R, and Erik Voeten. 2020. “Walking Back Human Rights in Europe?” European Journal of International Law 31 (3): 797–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa071.

Hendley, Kathryn. 2022. “Legal Dualism as a Framework for Analyzing the Role of Law Under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18 (Volume 18, 2022): 211–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050420-104012.

Hirschl, Ran. 2004. “Political Origins of the New Constitutionalism, The.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11: 71. http://0-heinonline.org.biblio.eui.eu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijgls11&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=8&men_tab=srchresults.

Hirschl, Ran. 2010. Constitutional Theocracy. Harvard University Press.

Hofmann, Andreas, and Daniel Naurin. 2021. “Explaining Interest Group Litigation in Europe: Evidence from the Comparative Interest Group Survey.” Governance 34 (4): 1235–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12556.

Jessee, Stephen, Neil Malhotra, and Maya Sen. 2022. “A Decade-Long Longitudinal Survey Shows That the Supreme Court Is Now Much More Conservative Than the Public.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (24): e2120284119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120284119.

Kagan, Robert A. 2003. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Harvard University Press.

Kahan, Dan M., David Hoffman, Danieli Evans, Neal Devins, Eugene Lucci, and Katherine Cheng. 2015. “Ideology or Situation Sense: An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 164 (2): 349–440. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/pnlr164&i=361.

Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena, Jarosław Kantorowicz, and Keren Weinshall. 2022. “Ideological Bias in Constitutional Judgments: Experimental Analysis and Potential Solutions.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19 (3): 716–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12323.

Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2007. “Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2): 421441. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm026.

Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2013. “Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 167–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00618.x.

Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 43 (1): 151–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00370.x.

Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2012. “Eurolegalism and Democracy.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02227.x.

Kern, Holger L., and Georg Vanberg. 2024. “Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law: Tainted Judges and Accountability for Nazi Crimes in West Germany.” The Journal of Politics, ahead of print, October 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/729959.

Krehbiel, Jay N. 2016. “The Politics of Judicial Procedures: The Role of Public Oral Hearings in the German Constitutional Court.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12229.

Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Allison J. Hamilton, and Caroline J. Tolbert. 2014. “Does Policy Adoption Change Opinions on Minority Rights? The Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914540483.

Landa, Dimitri, and Jeffrey R. Lax. 2009. “Legal Doctrine on Collegial Courts.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 946–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090811.

Larsson, Olof. 2021. “Political and Constitutional Overrides: The Case of the Court of Justice of European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (12): 1932–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1807586.

Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Tom S. Clark. 2012. “The Supreme Court’s Many Median Justices.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 847–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000469.

Lax, Jeffrey R., and Charles M. Cameron. 2007. “Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2): 276302.

Lehoucq, Emilio, and Whitney K. Taylor. 2020. “Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies?” Law & Social Inquiry 45 (1): 166–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.59.

Levendusky, Matthew, Shawn PattersonJr, Michele Margolis, Josh Pasek, Kenneth Winneg, and Kathleen H. Jamieson. 2024. “Has the Supreme Court Become Just Another Political Branch? Public Perceptions of Court Approval and Legitimacy in a Post-Dobbs World.” Science Advances, ahead of print, March 8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk9590.

Lim, Claire S. H. 2013. “Preferences and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials: Evidence from State Trial Court Judges.” American Economic Review 103 (4): 1360–97. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1360.

Lim, Claire S. H., James M. Snyder Jr., and David Strömberg. 2015. “The Judge, the Politician, and the Press: Newspaper Coverage and Criminal Sentencing Across Electoral Systems.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7 (4): 103–35. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20140111.

Linos, Katerina, and Kimberly Twist. 2016. “The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods.” The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2): 223–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/687365.

Linzer, Drew A., and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2015. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948-2012.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2): 223–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/682150.

Liu, John Zhuang, and Xueyao Li. 2019. “Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16 (3): 630–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12229.

Madsen, Mikael Rask, Juan A. Mayoral, Anton Strezhnev, and Erik Voeten. 2022. “Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 419–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001143.

Magalhães, Pedro C., Jon K. Skiple, Miguel M. Pereira, Sveinung Arnesen, and Henrik L. Bentsen. 2023. “Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 56 (10): 1537–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231152769.

Marcondes, Diego, Cláudia Peixoto, and Julio Michael Stern. 2019. “Assessing Randomness in Case Assignment: The Case Study of the Brazilian Supreme Court.” Law, Probability and Risk 18 (2-3): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgz006.

Meernik, James, and Joseph Ignagni. 1997. “Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 447–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111772.

Melton, James, and Tom Ginsburg. 2014. “Does De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation of Explanations for Judicial Independence.” Journal of Law and Courts 2 (2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/676999.

Micheli, David De, and Whitney K. Taylor. 2024. “Public Trust in Latin America’s Courts: Do Institutions Matter?” Government and Opposition 59 (1): 146–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.6.

Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938958.

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54 (2): 217–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551163.

Nelson, Michael J., Morgan L. W. Hazelton, and Rachael K. Hinkle. 2022. “How Interpersonal Contact Affects Appellate Review.” The Journal of Politics 84 (1): 573–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/714783.

Nixon, David C., and J. David Haskin. 2000. “Judicial Retirement Strategies: The Judge’s Role in Influencing Party Control of the Appellate Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 28 (4): 458–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X00028004002.

North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2122739.

Ofosu, Eugene K., Michelle K. Chambers, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Eric Hehman. 2019. “Same-Sex Marriage Legalization Associated with Reduced Implicit and Explicit Antigay Bias.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (18): 8846–51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806000116.

Pas, Kris van der. 2024. “All That Glitters Is Not Gold? Civil Society Organisations and the (Non-)Mobilisation of European Union Law.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 62 (2): 525–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13515.

Pavone, Tommaso. 2019. “From Marx to Market: Lawyers, European Law, and the Contentious Transformation of the Port of Genoa.” Law & Society Review 53 (3): 851–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12365.

Pavone, Tommaso, and Øyvind Stiansen. 2022. “The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform.” American Political Science Review 116 (1): 322–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873.

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Ignacio Arana Araya. 2017. “Strategic Retirement in Comparative Perspective: Supreme Court Justices in Presidential Regimes.” Journal of Law and Courts 5 (2): 173–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/692962.

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Andrea Castagnola. 2024. Judicial Tenure and Retirements. Edited by Lee Epstein, Gunnar Grendstad, Urška Šadl, and Keren Weinshall. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.20.

Pound, Roscoe. 1910. “Law in Books and Law in Action.” American Law Review 44: 12. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/amlr44&id=16&div=&collection=.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Chris Guthrie, and Andrew J. Wistrich. 2006. “Inside the Bankruptcy Judge’s Mind Symposium: The Role of the Judge in the Twenty-First Century.” Boston University Law Review 86 (5): 1227–66. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/bulr86&i=1239.

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J, and Andrew J Wistrich. 2017. “Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13: 203–29.

Ramseyer, J. Mark. 2001. “Why Are Japanese Judges So Conservative in Politically Charged Cases?” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 331–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401002040.

Rosenn, Keith S. 1987. “The Protection of Judicial Independence in Latin America.” University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 19 (1): 1–36. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/unmialr19&i=9.

Salzberger, Eli, and Paul Fenn. 1999. “Judicial Independence: Some Evidence from the English Court of Appeal.” The Journal of Law and Economics 42 (2): 831–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/467444.

Sanchez Urribarri, Raul A., Susanne Schorpp, Kirk A. Randazzo, and Donald R. Songer. 2011. “Explaining Changes to Rights Litigation: Testing a Multivariate Model in a Comparative Framework.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000156.

Schroeder, Philipp. 2022. “Pushing Boundaries: How Lawmakers Shape Judicial Decision-Making.” Comparative Political Studies 55 (14): 2447–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221089649.

Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review, 28–44.

Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of u.s. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83 (2): 557–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962405.

Segal, Jeffrey A., Chad Westerland, and Stefanie A. Lindquist. 2010. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00480.x.

Setzer, Joana, and Lisa C. Vanhala. 2019. “Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance.” WIREs Climate Change 10 (3): e580. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.580.

Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Sisk, Gregory C., Michael Heise, and Andrew P. Morriss. 1998. “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning.” New York University Law Review 73 (5): 1377–500. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nylr73&i=1393.

Skiple, Jon Kåre, Henrik Litleré Bentsen, and Mark Jonathan McKenzie. 2021. “How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of the Norwegian and Danish Supreme Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts 9 (1): 111–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/712654.

Spamann, Holger, and Lars Klöhn. 2016. “Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, Than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges.” The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2): 255–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/688861.

Spirig, Judith. 2023. “When Issue Salience Affects Adjudication: Evidence from Swiss Asylum Appeal Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (1): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12612.

Staton, Jeffrey K., and Will H. Moore. 2011. “Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics.” International Organization 65 (03): 553–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818311000130.

Sternberg, Sebastian, Sylvain Brouard, and Christoph Hönnige. 2022. “The Legitimacy-Conferring Capacity of Constitutional Courts: Evidence from a Comparative Survey Experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 61 (4): 973–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12480.

Stiansen, Øyvind. 2022. “(Non)renewable Terms and Judicial Independence in the European Court of Human Rights.” The Journal of Politics 84 (2): 992–1006. https://doi.org/10.1086/715253.

Stiansen, Øyvind, and Erik Voeten. 2020. “Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 64 (4): 770–84.

Stolzenberg, Ross M., and James Lindgren. 2022. “Judges as Party Animals: Retirement Timing by Federal Judges and Party Control of Judicial Appointments.” American Sociological Review 87 (4): 675–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221102072.

Swalve, Tilko. 2022. “Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19 (1): 223–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12308.

Tiede, Lydia Brashear. 2020. “Mixed Judicial Selection and Constitutional Review.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (7): 1092–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879961.

Tiede, Lydia Brashear. 2024. Selecting Judges. Edited by Lee Epstein, Gunnar Grendstad, Urška Šadl, and Keren Weinshall. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.18.

Toharia, José J. 1975. “Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain.” Law & Society Review 9 (3): 475–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053168.

Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1): 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.

Urbániková, Marína, Barbara Havelková, and David Kosař. 2024. “The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation.” Feminist Legal Studies 32 (3): 259–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w.

Vanberg, G. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science, 346–61.

Vanberg, Georg. 2015. “Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (1): 167–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161150.

Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review 46 (3): 523–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00505.x.

Vanhala, Lisa. 2018. “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (3): 380–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710257.

Vanhala, Lisa. 2022. “Environmental Legal Mobilization.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18 (Volume 18, 2022): 101–17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-104423.

Voeten, Erik. 2020. “Populism and Backlashes Against International Courts.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (2): 407–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719000975.

Voeten, Erik. 2022. “Is the Public Backlash Against Globalization a Backlash Against Legalization and Judicialization?” International Studies Review 24 (2): viac015. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac015.

Voeten, Erik. 2024. “Do Domestic Climate Rulings Make Climate Commitments More Credible? Evidence from Stock Market Returns.” The Journal of Politics, ahead of print, September 3. https://doi.org/10.1086/732952.

Ward, Dalston G., and Matthew Gabel. 2019. “Judicial Review Timing and Legislative Posturing: Reconsidering the Moral Hazard Problem.” The Journal of Politics 81 (2): 681–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/701763.

Weinshall-Margel, Keren. 2011. “Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (3): 556–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01220.x.

Whittington, Keith E. 2005. ““Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 583–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051890.

Wistrich, Andrew J., Chris Guthrie, and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski. 2005. “Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153: 1251–345.

Wistrich, Andrew J., Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Chris Guthrie. 2014. “Heart versus Head: Do Judges Follow the Law of Follow Their Feelings.” Texas Law Review 93: 855–924.

Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77 (3): 690–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268.

Zorn, Christopher, and Jennifer Barnes Bowie. 2010. “Ideological Influences on Decision Making in the Federal Judicial Hierarchy: An Empirical Assessment.” The Journal of Politics 72 (04): 12121221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000630.